|
AEROVET | Blog Entry | 0 replies | 13-October-2009 | Alan Brown |
Work in this area has been extended under the auspices of the new AEROVET project.
The AEROVET project will run from 2009 - 2012, so please feel free to start new discussions or to add to the existing ones. This discussion topic will focus upon issues concerned with AEROVET. AEROVET is a European comparative project funded under the Leonardo programme, which looks at how aircraft maintenance technician training is carried out in France, Germany, Spain and the UK and the scope for trainees to take some modules in another country and receive appropriate credit (and whether in future this could be facilitated under the auspices of ECVET). These four countries were involved in a previous project which involved the development of holistic Typical Professional Tasks (TPTs) for use in initial training in Airbus. The idea was that mastery of the TPTs would give a basis of developing expertise (and be a more reliable indicator than achievement of learning outcomes, because of the level of aggregation of the tasks), but it is possible to move from TPTs to LOs in order to construct modules, assign credit etc. which could be part of the ECVET system. This work is developmental and will feed into how the ECVET system evolves. TPTs have to be expressed in terms of skills, knowledge, understanding and competences which are already implied in the descriptions of the TPTs. The result will be that the TPTs are expressed in terms of (potentially Europe-wide) units – that is, the TPTs are turned into a form acceptable to accreditation bodies and potentially of use within ECVET. Each national team compares the units with the national regulations (in order to see whether there are any possible additions to be made to the units or whether there are any divergences. Each national team will calculate the relative weight of (each unit) of the national qualification and then ascribe notional credit points. This process will allow a comparison to be made between the ratings given between countries and it could also be linked to progression to higher level qualifications. The intention will then be to develop some (European) core profiles / common units. At the next stage the project will be concenred with the technical development of European sub-units etc. with the aim to allow progression to HE and the sub-units will be compared to the ECTS scheme (in a process of validation). |
|
Certifying competences of TPT 1 | Blog Entry | 0 replies | 20-August-2008 | Alan Brown |
TPT 1 relates to:
Production of metallic components for aircraft or ground support equipment
See attached file for details of: Certifying competences of TPT 1: |
|
European profile of competences diagram | Blog Entry | 0 replies1 resource | 29-February-2008 | Alan Brown |
see attached:
|
|
TPT discussions | Blog Entry | 0 replies3 resources | 21-September-2007 | Alan Brown |
Documents starting the discussion about TPTS are attached here.
Documents starting the discussion about TPTS are attached here. The first contribution came from our French colleagues who have mapped the extent to which the German TPTs make sense in a French context. The French training route to the “skilled workers” profiles foresees a 2-step training programme. The first one lasts for 2 years after the end of compulsory general education and leads to a diploma called CAP or BEP. Those with the BEP or the CAP may continue to the second stage, that lasts a further 2 years and leads to a Baccalauréat Professionnel (Vocational Baccalaureate or BacPro). For the sake of the AERONET project, only the BacPro profile has been chosen. They will be our 'skilled workers'. In Airbus St Eloi, these two last years to the BacPro are conducted within an apprenticeship contract. Those having stopped with a CAP or a BEP (70%) do also (mostly) work at Airbus but in other positions than those we chose to qualify 'skilled workers'. There are two different qualifications at this level of BacPro : the airframe mechanics and the avionics. For a continuation of this commentary, see the following document: |
|
Linking TPTs to Learning Stations | Blog Entry | 0 replies1 resource | 21-September-2007 | Alan Brown |
The document above gives an overview of a tool, that links the TPTs to one or more relevant work stations. It shall explain the founding theoretical idea to this tool, called also Learning Station Analysis (LSA). Furthermore it shall be described the distinguishing elements (from an ordanary description of work places for skilled workers) and what is the aim of linking TPTs to relevant work stations. Finally are mentioned the conditions for a successful analysis; examples are given. Contents: 1 INTRODUCTION 2 PROCEDURE - MILESTONES 3 ANALYSIS OF LEARNING STATIONS - THE APPROACH 3.1 PREPARATION OF THE ANALYSIS 3.2 MANUAL FOR THE ANALYSIS 3.3 ACCOMPLISHMENT OF THE ANALYSIS AND DOCUMENTATION 4 EVALUATION 5 EXAMPLE: DOCUMENTATION
|
|
Files presented at Broughton meeting February 2007 | Blog Entry | 1 reply8 resources | 21-September-2007 | Juergen LEDL |
Here are some of the key files presented at the Broughton meeting in February 2007.
The main topics covered in the Broughton meeting included: EASA-integration in VET; Overview: Questionnaire-results; TPT- presentations of the results in the countries; Evaluation and other upcoming steps. |
|
Learning station analysis (LSA) | Blog Entry | 1 reply | 22-May-2006 | Alan Brown |
When a young person is placed on a particular work stattion the learning potential of the work he or she is asked to undertake varies considerably.
|
|
Typical Professional Tasks (Germany) | Blog Entry | 4 replies2 resources | 19-March-2006 | Alan Brown |
The attached file gives a description of the 27 Typical Professional (mechanical and electrical) Tasks outlined below.
Typical Professional Tasks (TPTs)Mechanical:
Electrical:
|
|
Welcome to the new weblog | Blog Entry | 0 replies | 01-March-2006 | NGRF Site Administrator |
This is a place where team members can lead or contribute to discussion of issues of interest to the project.
Welcome!
This weblog will be a place where project members can discuss issues and assemble resources that they want placed in the public domain. |